Section One
What’s in a name?
Besides long, complex nicknames…
The Name of Your Character
This section
is devoted to the name of your character.
It is one of the sections where you do not have to think about it that
much, just a yes or no. You can
answer honestly here and not split hairs to avoid points. The section is important because if you
explain the story in a summary and readers see it is a name like one of the
following questions, the will immediately label it Mary Sue and leave. They won’t read it, even if the
character itself is not a Sue, simply the name. So, as you can see, the name really is a crucial part of a
character. In order to get the
good reviews we know you want, you need the readers first.
1.
Is the main character you, your
boyfriend, your best friend, your sister, brother, mother, father, any other
relation, or is the main character your idea of the perfect boyfriend and/or
girlfriend, perfect person in general, but not relation, sister, brother,
mother, father, or any other relation that you want? (+10000)
Put your
pencil down and step away from your desk.
You can stop now. No need
to waste any more time on this test when you could be working on a new
character.
2.
Is the character named in any way
after you or someone else you know?
(+1000)
This is high
because it is the typical “self-insertion” starting point. Mary Sues are classified as self-insertions
of the author to a very annoying extent, so starting it out with your name,
nickname, internet name, or anything like that is a big no-no. You are creative, come on! We know you can think of something
other than your own name. And even
if you didn’t do it because the character is you in a way, it screams to a lot
of readers that you are a Sue even if you are not. The majority of the time, if readers see that the name of
you character is the same as your penname, they won’t even look at it. It is dangerous, so don’t do it. Just don’t. NO EXCEPTIONS.
You do this, you’re Sued.
3.
Is the name a cute, cuddly name
(Adora, Sparkles)? (+50)
We are very
sorry, but no one likes names like Puffy and Sparkles and Yum-Yum—mostly
because no one really has names like that. Those are baby nicknames. And whenever your character is named this, they are usually
just like the name in the sense they are rather childish and annoying.
4.
Is the name an omnipotent or
powerful word (Raven, Aphrodite)? (+100)
Omnipotent
names are out of the question because the instant you start reading, you know
that the character is in some way going to upstage the canon characters. People don’t like this at all. Your character is supposed to be as if
it were part of canon, not FANON.
5.
Is the name a glamorous or hippy-ish
word (Rhapsody, Sapphire)? (+50)
And the 60s
ended quite a long time ago.
Moonbeam and Serenity are rather ridiculous, and it’s usually best NOT
to name your character after her birthstone—neither of which would happen in
real canon. Name them regular
names—Bob, Sally, John, or Anne.
Stick to regular names, kids.
6.
Is the name taken from an already
existing fictional, legendary, historical, mythological, or otherwise
pre-existing character (Calypso, Hellsing)? (+100)
It’s obvious
why you should not do this. If
they’re old, obvious, and well-known names of gods and such, it’s not very
creative and it’s rather silly. If
they’re modern fictional characters, it’s plagiarism. Enough said.
7.
Is the name, when translated,
something of great significance or just something silly, whether the translation
be real or fake (Majandra = Daughter of Darkness, Griffe-Corbeau = Ravenclaw)?
(+100)
While some
names DO mean something when translated, you should not give them direct
translations. That’s rather
silly—especially to give a minor character a name that means “Beater” in French
if he’s a beater on the team, or give someone a name that means “Ravenclaw” in
Portuguese if they’re a Ravenclaw.
And making up a fake translation is just silly—don’t name a character
something along the lines of Yahagrataba and say it means “Lord Voldemort’s
Destroyer,” because it very obviously does not. Also, make sure they have at least some minor purpose in the
fic—don’t make pointless insertions strictly for your amusement.
8.
Is it the name of an already
existing person, i.e., your heart-throb (Depp, Bloom)? (+100)
Err…no. This
is almost a sure sign that your character is a Sue, especially if she’s the
stunningly beautiful wife of Orli Bloom.
And no, it
isn’t cute to name your character after one of the actors in the HP movies,
especially when it implies your favorite relationship—Emma Radcliffe has been
seen more times than we care to count.
Leave the real people alone—they don’t deserve that sort of treatment.
9.
Is it something just plain weird
and/or obviously made-up (Paneknofret, Noxlumi)? (+100)
We do
understand that in J.K.’s world, which is an only slightly skewed take on the
real world, there are some unique and unusual names in the wizarding
world. But don’t go overboard—and
don’t do it at all if your character is Muggle-born and therefore was not born
a part of said wizarding world.
There are lots of real names in our world to choose from. Enjoy!
10.
Is it an unusual/odd spelling of a
normal name (B’randii, Brttnii)? (+100)
Kind of
obvious why you need to avoid these.
They’re just downright…ugly.
And confusing. You are
taking a name and twisting it to make your character seem unique when you do
this—when in reality, you’re just being like every other Sue out there. You may think you aren’t, but that is
what it is. We are Mervin and Mrs.
Hyde. If we wanted to be unique
and special, we would not have rewritten our names to spell mUeRvV’iNe and MiSuzHyyDDe. No.
11.
Is it an unusual/odd spelling of
anything relating to any of the previous questions? (Munlite, Saffire)? (+100)
Ahdoorah is
just as annoying as Adora, if not more so. Don’t do that.
12.
Did you spend a long time looking for
the perfect name and spelling? (+50)
*Note—names
whose meanings are meant to reflect your character’s attributes (Remus Lupin
the werewolf) do not count, just so long as you did not spend over an hour
searching
This one isn’t
as serious strictly because sometimes you want to devote a lot of time to your
character. And if it’s a character
that has some kind of mythological background or is symbolic of something, go
ahead! That is a big part of
J.K.’s universe. Just don’t spend
ridiculous amounts of time—that is a sign of an impending love affair with your
character, or the start of a long and heinously twisted plot that is going to
drive your readers up the wall.
You’ve got the Internet, encyclopedias, libraries, and all sorts of
stuff you from which can look them up.
It shouldn’t take you that long to find the right mythological character
or historical figure. But for all
others…well, usually when it takes that long for a normal name, it’s reserved
for people who are looking for a name for their future child.
13.
Is your character named/nicknamed
Kit or Cat/Kat (Yes, the name “Kitty” counts as well)? (+300)
This has got
to be the most overused, dry, cliché, worn-out, and Mary Sue name out
there. It doesn’t matter who or
what the character is or what fandom she is supposed to be a part of—chances
are, she’ll be a Mary Sue.
14.
Does the character have multiple
names (more than the usual first, middle, and last; nicknames and titles do
count)? (+100)
Her Royal Majesty
Sabrina Anna Yvonne Henrietta Blanche Regan “Spike” “Angel” “Pathological”
Anderson, Silverblood Sorceress of the Fyre MMCXXVII. We think that says enough.
15.
Does your character have titles
implying royalty (Her Royal Majesty; Princess; Queen; etc.)? (+200)
This is just
stupid. There is no royalty in the
Wizarding world. That is
established canon. Don’t do this.
16.
Does your character have a title
implying special powers or omniscience (Sorceress of Fire; Bearer of Ice;
etc.)? (+300)
This is even
worse than a previous. All that
sort of title does is play up how wonderful your character is an also gives
your character an opportunity to say her full name and dazzle everyone with her
rare abilities and magic with just her name. Avoid both of these at all costs. In fact, the only titles you should use are roman numerals.
17.
Does the character have constant
jokes (Tom Swifties) made about their name(s) because of their format or full
name or nickname (We do not appreciate fifty million Sirius Lee and Sirius
Orion Black [S.O.B.] jokes.)? (+50)
The man is
dead, have some respect!!! Anyway,
your character…we are sorry, but if your character is named Frank N. Stein and
everyone finds this hilarious no matter how many times you repeat…it’s just not
funny. Leave it alone. One joke is fine. Derivation of a nickname because of
mispronunciation—fine. All
others—not so fine.
18.
Do all of the canon characters think
that your character’s name is so cool? (+100)
This is
classic Mary Sue self-insertion. We
all wish that everyone thought that everything about us was just the living
end, but we have to face that truth—they don’t. So just because you wish that everyone thought that about
you, and because you think that your character is that cool, don’t make the
reader suffer though descriptions of how everyone in your story thinks that the
character is that cool. It’s
nothing more that calling attention to your character and praising her. It gets old, it gets irritating, and
every Mary Sue in the book does it.
19.
Did you name the character this name
because you thought it is an awesome name and/or want to change your name to
it? (+100)
Refer to the
first question. While there is no
harm is choosing a name that you like, this is where is crosses the line into
self-insertion. You are not the
character. Got it?
20.
Have you considered naming your pet
this? (+100)
Naming your
pet after a fanon character is kinda eerie. It’s some sort of disturbing attempt to make yourself part
of the plot, or something.
21.
Have you already named your pet
this? (+200)
See the
previous question, only add in “Trying to bring out your character into a
living being is not working.”